An 87-year-old disabled woman whose forced removal from her Madrid apartment ignited nationwide protests will be allowed to move back into the home she has occupied for more than seven decades, her lawyer has confirmed. Maricarmen Abascal became the face of Spain's escalating housing crisis after she was carried out of her flat on a stretcher on 23 September, an event that prompted public outrage and intensified pressure on the government to act.
Her lawyer, Beatriz Duro, told reporters at a press conference that an agreement had been reached between the parties involved and that Abascal would return under a new rental contract at a rate similar to what she previously paid. The arrangement, according to Duro, avoids the steep increase that had been demanded by the property's owner and represents what she described as a direct consequence of public mobilisation. The deal has not yet been formally signed.
Abascal was taken to hospital following the eviction and is reportedly being treated for exhaustion. Duro said the elderly woman would sign the agreement once her health improves. The lawyer credited "goodwill from both parties" for making the resolution possible, suggesting that negotiations had been conducted with a degree of cooperation despite the highly charged circumstances surrounding the case.
The dispute centred on a rent hike that Abascal could not afford. Her father first rented the apartment in 1956, and she continued living there as the tenant after her parents died. During much of that period, the rent was subject to a cap that kept it affordable. That changed after the investment firm Urbagestión purchased the property in 2018 and raised the monthly rent from €500 to €2,650 — an increase of more than fivefold.
The company later offered to lower the rent to €1,650, but even that reduced figure remained beyond Abascal's means. Her monthly pension amounts to €1,350, leaving her with a shortfall of several hundred euros under the proposed terms. The mismatch between her fixed income and the market-rate rent illustrates a broader challenge facing pensioners in Spain's increasingly expensive urban housing market.
Courts had blocked three previous attempts to evict Abascal, giving her a temporary reprieve. However, the fourth attempt succeeded, and images of the frail woman being removed from her home circulated widely on social media and news outlets. The visual impact of the eviction, coming after years of legal battles, helped transform her personal ordeal into a symbol of a national problem.
The reaction was swift and widespread. Tens of thousands of people marched through Madrid on Saturday to protest against the eviction and to demand stronger protections for tenants. Demonstrators framed the case as emblematic of a housing system that prioritises property speculation over the basic need for shelter, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and disabled.
Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has promised housing relief measures, with his cabinet scheduled to meet on Tuesday to discuss potential actions. Sanchez's Socialist Party lacks a majority in Parliament, meaning any legislative effort to address the housing crisis will require support from other parties. The government is hoping to pass a law aimed at appeasing public anger and addressing the structural issues that allowed Abascal's situation to develop.
The scale of Spain's housing shortage is substantial. The Bank of Spain estimates that the country is short of approximately 700,000 homes, a figure calculated by comparing demand with the pace of new construction. The gap has contributed to soaring rents in major cities, making it increasingly difficult for lower-income residents to secure affordable accommodation.
Supporters of Abascal celebrated the agreement as a victory but made clear that their campaign is not over. They pledged to continue fighting to prevent similar evictions and to press for policies that expand access to affordable housing. For them, the resolution of one case, while significant, does not address the underlying conditions that produced it.
The agreement, if finalised, would allow Abascal to return to the apartment where she has lived since childhood. Under the new contract, she would pay a sum comparable to her previous rent, shielding her from the dramatic increase that Urbagestión had sought. The company has not publicly commented on the terms of the arrangement.
Duro characterised the outcome as the "result of the social mobilisation" that followed the eviction, underscoring the role that public pressure played in shifting the negotiation dynamics. The case has also drawn attention to the legal frameworks governing rental properties in Spain, particularly those with long-term tenants whose original leases predate significant market changes.
For Abascal herself, the immediate priority is recovery. Her lawyer indicated that she remains unwell and will finalise the paperwork when she is well enough to do so. The return to her home, while welcome, comes after a traumatic experience that required hospital treatment and placed her at the centre of a national debate she never sought to join.
The broader political implications remain uncertain. The government's proposed measures will need to navigate a fragmented parliament, and the effectiveness of any new law will depend on its ability to balance the interests of property owners with the need to protect tenants. The case of Maricarmen Abascal has ensured that housing will remain a prominent issue in Spanish politics for the foreseeable future, serving as a reminder of the human costs behind statistics on shortages and rising rents.
Comments (0)