fitri-handayani
Three female journalists in India have come forward with allegations that police officers sexually harassed them while they were covering street protests in the capital, New Delhi. The accusations, made public on Saturday, have intensified scrutiny of law enforcement conduct during a growing wave of demonstrations against the country's chief election commissioner.
The complaints emerged after police detained numerous young people who had gathered to demand the resignation of Gyanesh Kumar, the head of India's Election Commission. According to the accounts provided by the three women, the harassment included inappropriate touching by officers during the chaotic scenes that unfolded at the protest site.
Delhi Police acknowledged the seriousness of the claims in a statement posted on social media. The force confirmed that its New Delhi District had received the complaint and indicated that the matter had been handed over to its crime branch. Authorities pledged that the investigation would be conducted in a manner that is both "fair and impartial," though no timeline was provided for when findings might be released.
The demonstrations show no sign of abating. On Sunday, thousands of protesters assembled in both Delhi and Mumbai for a third consecutive day, reiterating their demand that Kumar step down from his position. At the heart of their anger is a large-scale revision of the country's voter rolls, an exercise they contend is designed to benefit Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party.
The Election Commission has defended the initiative, maintaining that its purpose is to eliminate duplicate and ineligible entries from the electoral register. Officials point out that the last such revision took place nearly twenty-five years ago, and argue that the list requires updating to reflect deaths, emigration, and voters who have registered in multiple locations after relocating. To date, the commission says approximately 130 million names have been removed from the voters' list.
Critics, however, view the exercise with deep suspicion. Opposition parties have accused Kumar of manipulating the voter rolls to advantage the BJP in future elections. Both the BJP and the Election Commission have rejected these allegations as unfounded.
Video footage circulating online depicts scenes of physical confrontations between demonstrators and law enforcement personnel. In one widely shared clip, people can be seen being dragged away from the Jantar Mantar protest site in central Delhi. The location has historically served as a designated area for public demonstrations in the capital.
Among those caught up in the clashes was Aahna Singh, an activist and student at Jawaharlal Nehru University. Speaking to Reuters news agency, she described being dragged by her hair by police officers. Singh characterized the police response as an example of "brutality" against peaceful protesters.
Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi weighed in on the situation, expressing concern about the safety of women in the country. He stated that women fear for their security and insisted that the home ministry must "answer for this." His comments add a prominent political voice to the chorus of criticism directed at both law enforcement and the election commission.
The Press Club of India has also responded forcefully to the allegations. The organization demanded immediate action against the officers accused of misconduct, expressing shock and dismay at how journalists were treated while carrying out their professional duties. In a statement, the Press Club emphasized that such behaviour cannot be accepted in a democracy and stressed that journalists must be permitted to work freely and without fear, particularly when documenting gatherings where citizens raise important issues.
The protests have drawn support from a diverse coalition of participants, including backers of the influential Cockroach Janta Party, a group that originated as an online satirical movement. The CJP has since evolved into a significant pressure group, achieving its first major victory in July when it compelled the then Education Minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, to resign following weeks of demonstrations calling for education reforms.
The CJP's involvement in the current protests was prompted by a report published in The Indian Express. According to that report, Kumar's two fellow election commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, had formally registered objections at least 14 times over a period of 10 months. They claimed that certain decisions and orders had been issued without their knowledge. The disagreements were reportedly centered primarily on the contentious Special Intensive Revision of the electoral rolls, which commenced last year.
In response to the revelations, the Election Commission issued a statement defending its internal processes. The commission asserted that "differing views" are a normal part of the "decision-making process" and maintained that all decisions were ultimately taken unanimously. Despite this explanation, the disclosure of the internal objections sparked widespread outrage, with opposition leaders renewing their calls for Kumar's resignation.
The controversy surrounding the voter roll revision has become a flashpoint in Indian politics, raising questions about the independence of the Election Commission and the integrity of the electoral process. As protests continue across major cities, the allegations of sexual harassment against police officers have added a new and troubling dimension to an already volatile situation. The outcome of the crime branch investigation will be closely watched by journalists, activists, and political observers alike.
Comments (0)